Scalia the Originalist

By |2013-12-12T14:43:26-06:00October 16th, 2012|Categories: Constitution, Supreme Court|Tags: |

Scalia Dissents: Writings of the Supreme Court’s Wittiest, Most Outspoken Justice edited and with commentary by Kevin A. Ring. The Opinions of Justice Antonin Scalia: The Caustic Conservative edited and with commentary by Paul I. Weizer. Justice Antonin Scalia has established himself as the foremost defender of the constitutional orthodoxy of originalism—in particular, of the [...]

The Judicial Branch: Sabotaging Democracy?

By |2021-09-24T09:33:29-05:00September 21st, 2012|Categories: Constitution, Supreme Court|Tags: |

The judicial branch has a particularly vital function of securing the balance of powers necessary for liberty to triumph, and so that branch’s propensity to overreach and simply dictate new law has led to an imbalance in the system as designed. The result is a broken constitutional framework for American democracy. Popular support for the [...]

Conservatism, Centralization, and Constitutional Federalism

By |2016-11-28T18:51:56-06:00September 17th, 2012|Categories: American Founding, Constitution, Featured, Federalist Papers, George W. Carey, Supreme Court|Tags: |

My purpose is to set forth and explore the ramifications of two different conceptions or paradigms of American federalism whose roots can be traced to The Federalist essays of both Hamilton and Madison. Certain conclusions flow from this analysis that, in my judgment, are important to the conservative approach and thinking about centralization. Perhaps the [...]

Defending the Constitution

By |2018-10-26T23:42:13-05:00August 31st, 2012|Categories: Abortion, Books, Constitution, George W. Carey, Supreme Court|Tags: , |

In Defense of the Constitution, by George Carey (214 pages, Liberty Fund, 1995) Most Americans are puzzled that their belief in limited government is not matched by government officials who persistently intrude into their daily lives. Also, their settled beliefs regarding what is right— what they are permitted to do— and what they must not do, [...]

What’s in a name, or “The Individual Mandate is a Unicorn”

By |2014-12-30T18:13:32-06:00July 10th, 2012|Categories: Bruce Frohnen, Constitution, Politics, Supreme Court|

It is official. Obamacare is Constitutional. And we all know why: because Chief Justice Roberts says the individual mandate is not actually a mandate, it is a tax. The critical passage from the opinion nicely sums up Roberts’ decree: “The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. That Clause [...]

Go to Top