the imaginative conservative logo

cable news

I often wonder what benefit is derived from the obsession so many of us have with cable news. From my observation, the byproducts of watching and listening to the pundit class drone on are anger, mistrust, and, if we are honest, abject hatred for the opposing opinion. All that is offered on these channels are the superficial views of those who have inexplicably risen to their present positions entirely because they have figured out how to profit from giving their opinions. Men and women hold as tightly to the vitriolic verbosity promulgated by the cable news outlets as they do to the truths of the Gospels, if not perhaps just a little bit tighter. Again I ask, what joy is gained from following these people?

The great philosophers contend that the chief aim of life is to pursue happiness, and that happiness comes from living virtuously. Yet having listened not only to the corporately-funded tirades of these charlatans, but also to the ensuing recitation of said tirades by their listeners, I feel confident in claiming that there is neither happiness nor virtue to be gained from taking any of these pundits the least bit seriously. Who finds happiness in hearing about all the various ways in which our country is allegedly threatened both from without and within? Who finds joy in the hate-mongering and slander perpetrated by both sides of the political divide? Imagine going to the doctor for a once-a-year check-up and always being told you have but a single year remaining to live. It is to be hoped that you would eventually either seek a second opinion, or else find a new physician entirely.

In each man’s life there is enough true, verifiable difficulty to occupy his attention: relationship problems, financial distress, sickness, workplace issues. Yet these peddlers of fear, hate, disgust, and discord only inject more stress into the lives of those who take them seriously.

Yes, it is important to know what is happening in the world. There is no doubt about this, but what we see today is not a concern on the part of cable news viewers with the state of world political affairs (seeing as everything is political, including professional sports), so much as an obsession. Again I utter my refrain—where is the joy to be found?

I have a theory. What passes for the “news” today is one part world affairs and three parts custom-fit sensationalism. News agencies report on the stories their audiences want to hear. They also adopt an angle on these stories that their audiences expect and prefer. Thus, for example, the viewer hears that this or that political figure—always on the other end of the political spectrum—has embroiled himself or herself in so-and-so new scandal and, would you know it, this viewer has been saying this all along that his guy or gal was a bum in the first place.

And why would not these media outlets push such stories? No one wants to hear that things out there are good. That will not sell advertising space! The news must be down and dirty, the true depravity of man must be clearly exhibited, and the opposition must be set up as the antagonists. The “news” today is nothing more than a manufactured, contrived, never-ending morality tale.

Despite the internal discontent engendered in him by news-watching, man continues to place his faith in these discordant news outlets. Why? Because by so doing, the onus of critical thought is removed. He no longer need think for himself when this man or woman who has his own television show is paid to do the thinking for him. How very convenient. This same man or woman—pre-selected for viewing because he or she is already sympathetic to one’s own political opinions— always views issues from the same perspective. It must mean that is the the right way—indeed the only way—to look at this issue.

What joy then is to be found in the watching of cable news, and the listening of talk radio? Circuitous validation. Watch the show, hear your pre-existing opinion be confirmed, and go to bed happy knowing that you are right and that your co-worker George in accounting is wrong.

Modern man is no longer interested in finding the truth. Rather, he is interested in being validated. So much of what passes for news can be easily disproved, or at the very least can be found to be evidence neutral, but because it sounds good and feels right, it is correct enough.

Let us turn off our televisions, spend time with our families, go out into the world, and see what the truth really is.

Editor’s note: This is the second of a three-part series on the concept of happiness. The others essays may be found here and hereBooks on the topic of this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
6 replies to this post
  1. Yes, he nailed it! News-porn, about as informative as watching dogs fight. As I wrote elsewhere on TIC, science has established that how we use our brains cha nges how our brains work, so polluting them with news porn (or conventional porn) affects what we are.

    • Mr. Masty, your praise is kind and most welcome. Though I cannot recall the title of the piece you reference, due to having read so much not just of your work but of the work done here in general, I do recall having read this particular essay, and it was lodged in the back of my mind as I wrote this. I would like to one day expound on this idea, but given that this is well into my “ranting” territory, the results would be either brilliant or blunder. And yes, news porn – a phrase I have used often and yet neglected here. Missed opportunity.

  2. “’The News’, with its inevitable editorial selectivity can—at least in the minds of the uncurious and suggestible—actually help to spread ignorance dressed up as illusory knowledge….Its power comes from the illusion it creates that you can sit back and soak up all you need to ‘know’ about the big wide world without actually having to be all that curious about it.”

    • Mr. Cunningham, I have read and re-read the essay you reference several times over since discovering T.I.C. last year, and I must admit that you give the media an excellent treatment.

  3. Ignore the Media!
    Have Family Time!
    Go See for Ourselves!
    I suppose next, you will be advocating the reading of ancient books to “improve our minds”, and “gain perspective”?
    How contrarian.
    (Keep it up.)

    • It is funny that you ask about reading ancient books! In an earlier draft I had included a line something to the effect of, “… read a few authors long dead…” They just seem, whether it is true or just my preference, to offer more gripping insight. Read on, brother David.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: