Whig Meeting fabius caesar

John Willson’s most recent post makes me want to revive the Whig Party.

Well, at least the part of the Whig Party that knew that executive power could be readily abused. Our earlier Whig allies once called Andrew Jackson, “King Andrew.” Somehow, this always rubbed me the wrong way, as I often think of figures such as King Alfred or King Aragorn when I think of “king.” That is, calling Jackson “King Andrew” did a disservice to all of the wonderful Christian kings of the past and of fiction.

“Caesar, bloodthirsty, white supremacist” Jackson might be a better title. I wonder if much of the same might be written about the man currently sitting in the White House.

[As an aside, what would Obama look like with Andrew Jackson style hair? Far more interesting than he now appears—he’s essentially a Democratic version of Mitt Romney: boring, plastic Ken dolls, made by Mattel in a factory, far, far away.]

Anyway, back to the rant.

Caesar Barackus fits much better than “King Obama.” If Willson is correct (and, with the exception of his taste in beer, he generally is), we Americans are living somewhere around or near 66AD in the Roman Empire.

Caesar Baruckus, more Nero than Augustus. Beware Jews and Christians. . . you will fiddle while Rome burns.

Books on the topic of this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative BookstoreThe Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics—we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

All comments are moderated and must be civil, concise, and constructive to the conversation. Comments that are critical of an essay may be approved, but comments containing ad hominem criticism of the author will not be published. Also, comments containing web links or block quotations are unlikely to be approved. Keep in mind that essays represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Imaginative Conservative or its editor or publisher.

Leave a Comment
Print Friendly, PDF & Email