the imaginative conservative logo

ed_notesIf I think about it, I am saddened that I received the invitation later in life. I wish I had received and accepted the invitation in High School, or college, or certainly graduate school. It was not all my fault, I was not told about the invitation until about twelve years ago. Since that time, I have invited hundreds and hope to invite many more.

What is The Great Conversation? The actual wording I am most familiar with comes through the writings and lives of Mortimer Adler and Robert Hutchins. Since the 1960’s those two men and a handful of others fought valiantly against social and cultural trends that would all but be the end of the Great Tradition, the Great Books, and the Great Conversation. While things have gotten considerably worse since these intellectual warriors declared a strategy of intellectual health, there are loving resistance fighters and pockets of resistance found here and there.

Robert Hutchins said: “Until lately the west has regarded it as self-evident that the road to education lay through Great Books. No man was educated unless he was acquainted with the masterpieces of this tradition. There never was very much doubt in anybody’s mind about which the masterpieces were. They were the books that had endured and that the common voice of mankind call the finest creations, in writing, of the Western mind.”

Since Hutchins originally penned these words, various “isms” stormed the gates of the academy and established themselves as the norm. My wife (a librarian, yes, there are still a few of those left also, yet to be replaced by “media specialists”) and I were discussing several works of “Young Adult fiction” and both agreed how extremely dark they were, and concluded that where God is murdered, despair ensues.

Later, in the same essay, Hutchins said of Liberal education, “The substance of liberal education appears to consist in the recognition of basic problems, and knowledge of distinctions and interrelations and subject matter, and in the comprehension of ideas.” With the ongoing debate about the meaning and value of a Liberal education, it should surprise no one that we have no way of addressing basic problems, and our ability to make distinctions has evaporated. The common inability to connect even the most readily connected shows what happens when we abandon education that is natural to and formatve of the human mind.

It was Mortimer Adler, who later wrote, “the goods of the mind are information, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom.” That is, we naturally desire these things for the mind. And yet, we have become inundated with trivial disconnected information, bombarded with surface knowledge, given a shallow understanding, and who really, talks about wisdom any longer? If Adler is right (and he is) that wisdom, “is generally acknowledged to be the highest good of the human mind, ” then we are in serious trouble being part of human history that no longer even uses the term.

You do not need to be an historian to know that “there is a clear break between this century and the twenty-five centuries that precede it in the tradition of Western civilization.” We are paying dearly for our ignorance and rebellion. We are reaping the consequences of ignoring the invitation to join that Great Conversation. Our only hope, on a humane level, is to hear the invitation and join in that conversation. There is much knowledge, understanding, and yes, even wisdom found in that conversation.

Books mentioned in this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
5 replies to this post
  1. Thank you for this! I was invited in college… and feel years behind. I'm slowing making up for it, and feel blessed by the experience to truly understand my fellow Man.

  2. While I was a classics and English major in college I didn't become a fan of Mortimer Adler and his great books curriculum until about five years ago. I use his 8 steps for literary analysis in my 8th grade English class. Thanks for keeping the faith.

  3. The great GK Chesterton explained how the conversation stopped. He predicted its end in 1908, when he wrote "Orthodoxy."

    "… there is a great and possible peril to the human mind: a peril as practical as burglary. Against it religious authority was reared, rightly or wrongly, as a barrier. And against it something certainly must be reared as a barrier, if our race is to avoid ruin.

    "That peril is that the human intellect is free to destroy itself. Just as one generation could prevent the very existence of the next generation, by all entering a monastery or jumping into the sea, so one set of thinkers can in some degree prevent further thinking by teaching the next generation that there is no validity in any human thought. It is idle to talk always of the alternative of reason and faith. Reason is itself a matter of faith. It is an act of faith to assert that our thoughts have any relation to reality at all. If you are merely a sceptic, you must sooner or later ask yourself the question, "Why should ANYTHING go right; even observation and deduction? Why should not good logic be as misleading as bad logic? They are both movements in the brain of a bewildered ape?" The young sceptic says, "I have a right to think for myself." But the old sceptic, the complete sceptic, says, "I have no right to think for myself. I have no right to think at all." "

    When the West decided that thoughts meant nothing universal, but merely expressed the prejudices of the thinker, then it made no sense to continue the conversation.

    The conversation cannot be reconvened; it must be started afresh.

  4. Nobody invited me. I stumbled upon them all by myself when I was yet in grade school are the poor side of Wewoka, Oklahoma. Fortunately Boren's Bookstore carried The Modern Library and between those books, purchased and read at the rate of one a week, and the public library I managed my way through the culture of Greece, Rome, the middle ages and the renaissance. I could not imagine why I wasn't being joined by others because the ideas I found there were so exciting that the more ordinary reading of my peers was deadly by comparison.

    The Rt. Rev'd H. Lee Poteet

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: